The U. S. government filed a lawsuit against Adobe for bringing a civil environmental action claiming that Adobe has been misleading customers to force them to upgrade to its Creative Cloud. FTC, on April 24, 2017, said that Adobe failed to support those claims and that its practices violate section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. On June 17, 2024, DOJ filed a lawsuit referring to the complaint of FTC.
US Government Sues Adobe for Hidden Cancellation Fees
Allegations of Misleading Subscription Terms
The DOJ’s legal action states that Adobe has not properly explained that the “Annual, Paid Monthly” plan requires one year of involvement. The DOJ said that Adobe biased users to this plan and did not sufficiently explain that they would have to pay prohibitive cancellation charges if they canceled early. This practice, the DOJ says made the users stuck with a service they may not always need for a year and thus had to pay.
FTC takes action against Adobe and executives for hiding fees, preventing consumers from easily cancelling software subscriptions: https://t.co/tJ7J3tLxc4 /1
— FTC (@FTC) June 17, 2024
Frustrating Cancellation Process
The case also asserts that Adobe employs an extremely complex cancellation process to discourage clients from preventing the payments. This is because clients have complained that they face several barriers hindering them from canceling, including; dropped calls during the cancellations, and repeated live chats. Such tactics ensured that it was nearly impossible for users to be able to manage a break from their subscriptions.
FTC’s Stance on Consumer Protection
This lawsuit is about consumers and making certain that they are not subjected to unfair business practices,” said Samuel Levine the Director of the Bureau of Consumer Protection at the FTC. We accused Adobe of tricking customers into thinking that they are getting free trials while in reality they are signing up for a subscription that is very hard to cancel and this is destructive to consumers.
History of User Frustration
People have complained about the Adobe subscription model since the inception of the strategy. This problem manifested in a social media post in 2021 where one user posted a screenshot showing a notice, they had been charged nearly $300, after canceling a Creative Cloud subscription. This made users so upset due to the consistent problem with the subscription of Adobe’s software.
Recent Controversies
Adobe was assaulted once more in June 2024 when the Photoshop Terms of Service were changed. It weirded people out that Adobe had permission to access their content for “content review;” people also did not appreciate the idea of confidential projects being used to train AI. There was a lot of hue and cry created by the public and based on this, Adobe changed the Terms of Service.
Implications for Tech Companies
Adobe is now facing a lawsuit for constant pestering and the court verdict is seen as a warning to multiple technological industries, that use subscription services. Thus, the role of clear and easy-to-understand information and the absence of any difficulties in canceling their subscription is valuable for establishing trust in the company and its services offered to target consumers. This action by the FTC proves that the agency is ready to guard consumers against untruthful claims and treat them fairly in the online environment.
Adobe’s legal blunders with the U. S government provide grounds for why subscription services should be transparent and fair. Altogether, it keeps reminding the aforementioned companies and all similar chains that being deceitful and using uncompromising cancellation mechanisms may cost a business a great deal of legal and reputational repercussions.
Source 1, Source 2, Source 3, Source 4 | Via 1, Via 2
